|
|
SaltPeter |
|
|
Posts: 83
Time Online: 21 hours 20 minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
RocketballSA |
| February 3, 2008, 12:18pm |
|
|
Posts: 1514
Time Online: 35 days 13 hours 35 minutes
|
Not a bad policy at that Peter. Printed one out the other day. Did notice one small technical error in it. Under 5.6.5 Where the term reads 'the maximum permitted size of rocket motor is a commercially available motor up to size G, with maximum thrust up to 160 Newton-secounds.' Is that meant to read 'with maximum total impulse up to 160 newton-secounds.' RocketballSA |
| Has anyone ever heard of the paperwork reduction act? President ARA # 001 Level 2 FTO Secretary/Treasurer AARC # 002 Level 2 FTO ARA FPAA representative ARA CASA liasion officer http://www.australianrocketryforum.com.auWhat is misleading and deceptive conduct?http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/815335 |
|
|
|
|
|
SaltPeter |
| February 4, 2008, 12:18pm |
|
|
Posts: 83
Time Online: 21 hours 20 minutes
|
Thanks for pointing that out, Rocketball.. I will add that to the list of pending changes. Down further we refer to a LCO as a LSO also. I will have to learn physics one day.
Peter. |
|
|
|
|
|
RocketballSA |
|
|
Posts: 1514
Time Online: 35 days 13 hours 35 minutes
|
Sing out Saltpeter if you would like any help or suggestions for the MAAA MOP! Considering the goals of the ARA and MAAA are really not that much different it appears appropriete to help each other out!  |
| Has anyone ever heard of the paperwork reduction act? President ARA # 001 Level 2 FTO Secretary/Treasurer AARC # 002 Level 2 FTO ARA FPAA representative ARA CASA liasion officer http://www.australianrocketryforum.com.auWhat is misleading and deceptive conduct?http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/815335 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 147 |
| February 16, 2010, 10:00am |
|
Guest User |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
SaltPeter |
| February 16, 2010, 12:54pm |
|
|
Posts: 83
Time Online: 21 hours 20 minutes
|
Yes is plot to foil dangerous soviet activities.
The MOP started as a risk analysis, went to a risk management plan and then had to be bent to be consistent with the FAI rules for space models. I think the wording is "no significant metal parts" and the intent of the launch gear is to keep everything pointing in the right direction until the craft is aerodynamic. If the MOP needs to be changed, there are ways to do that, with the appropriate approvals. We usually have a large group of members of the public whom I am most concerned about.
At least the insurers were happy with a risk management plan, and that was the starting point.
I enjoyed your pictures. Admire your dedication. I still don't know how you Kosmonauts manage to share one cubic metre of air per person with a wooden heat shield for re-entry. You must really trust your team. Peter |
|
|
|
|
|
| 147 |
| February 16, 2010, 5:12pm |
|
Guest User |
In Soviet Union rockets can be replaced...but so can people and rockets are more expensive so screw people! And yes we are very careful about wording of rules because...  |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
|